A Muddied Rose?
Posted by VeRonda Wicks August 2nd, 2009I was lying awake in bed and just had to get up to write this story… It’s a story that I seriously cannot get my head around because it involves so many facets of life that it is incredible.
One of the all time hitters in the game of baseball name just resurfaced as a possible candidate for Baseball’s Hall of Fame. Pete Rose, a former Cincinnati Reds, was banned from the game 20 years ago for gambling on the game—his own team to be exact. Apparently, he never wagered against the team, as he believed in their victory, but it was an obvious flaw in judgment since it was a known rule within the sport. Now, with all of today’s scandal and outcry that has whirlwind out of the sport, baseball fans and the powers that be are now asking themselves where does Rose fit in all this…
The grounds for being inducted into the Hall of Fame are pretty clear. It is based on the player’s record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played. But wait, this is where I am totally dumbfounded because some of today’s elite Major League Baseball players who are being considered for the Hall are involved in using steroids, corking bats, serving jail time, spousal abuse, and the list goes on and on. So, I simply ask, what is the difference? I mean, put any of the offenses that I just listed up against gambling within the sport and it comes out the same—amoral, illegal, unethical, criminal, and just wrong.
I’m telling you, I’m drained by it all (drained!). There just appears to be no way to gage it. I mean, black is black and white is white, but when you’re dealing in muddied waters, you have to consider gray, right?






August 3rd, 2009 at 9:54 am
Great article, lots of intersting things to digest. Very informative
August 3rd, 2009 at 8:00 pm
Really enjoyed this! Well done!
August 4th, 2009 at 6:54 am
I don’t think Pete ever bet = regarding his own team. I just don’t And I think it’s a shame that after his career, his whole career that this ‘thing’ would bar him from the HOF. Simply dumb.
August 5th, 2009 at 10:59 pm
Hey guys… I appreciate you dropping by.
Okay, I’m really on this story because I think fair is fair. If the rules have been reevaluated to now include alleged cheaters, then let’s do this across the board.
I’m sure it’s more to come on this…
August 5th, 2009 at 11:10 pm
If Rose broke the rule then he should pay the price… but I didn’t think that the baseball HOF was a MLB entity. If that’s true then the HOF voters that are keeping Rose out are hypocritical at best.
August 5th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
Doug you are correct… I mean obviously the HOF is a seperate entity, but it responds as an affliate to the sport. So with that in mind, the two should have similar rules and such. All I’m posing is that there should be equality across the board. Thanks for your comment and visit again soon!
August 8th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
I agree with you VeRonda on all points and the hypocrites casting the ballot should be removed and replaced by those who played the game professionally.
The greatest journalistic awards given out to journalist and sportswriters do not allow professional athletes to cast a vote as to whether they should be inducted or receive an award. Their peers do!
It would outrage the journalistic community if Pete Rose or Michael Irvin or Karl Malone had a say as to whether they get the Pulitzer or be inducted into a journalistic society or hall of fame. The outcry would be so deafening because the massive heartburn would be that athletes don’t know what it takes to be a sports journalist. They haven’t studied journalism nor worked as a journalist therefore they should have no voice or say so into the selection of recognition of journalist. And in reality, they don’t. Yet, such logic doesn’t apply with professional athletes and the HOF.
You have journalist who have never professionally played the game and almost 99% has never played beyond high school if they played! Yet they have made themselves gods who knows what its like to be a professional athlete and what such athletes think when they are in pressure situations in games. These folks are totally oblivious to what goes on in the game and the preparation required and yet they are vested with the authority to determine if someone is good enough to be inducted into the highest honor of their sport.
They use their paradigms and holier than thou mentalities to govern who should be in the HOF. It’s mainly subjective based off of how they feel when it’s time to vote. A warped system but the only one there is and as such the egos of these guys are off the charts.
With Rose’s accomplishments, he should be in. His off the field antics should not have any influence, for if indeed that’s a criteria then many of the current hall of famers in all sports should be taken out. Especially those who competed when Blacks were denied the opportunity to do so. Y’know, the pre-segregation of sports.
The highest honor of the sports are entrusted to those who never played and as such one must kneel and plant a kiss on the posterior’s of the journalist if they are to receive just due.
Rose is punished by the occupational vocational elitist and so will Barry Bonds. His accomplishments before he went to San Francisco alone makes him a hall of famer but since he was not friendly to the journalist and the steroid allegations later in his career he will be summarily dismissed when his time comes.
Again, the gods control and they will always sit on their throne of smugness and determine the fate of an athlete’s accomplishment.
It is what it is and hopefully by the time your children are graduating from college, the current crop of journalistic old farts will be replaced with a new generation of journalist who rely merely on the on the field accomplishments of an athlete to be the one and only determining factor. Again, I want my funk uncut!
Kid Funkedelic
August 8th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
Wow, Kid!… what else can I say? LOL! You’ve taken my post and added so much more… So, Pete should be in, huh?
August 9th, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Absolutely!!!!
August 9th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
I got you, Kid… I got you. BTW, I think you’re making an impression on my other readers, too. LOL!
August 2nd, 2010 at 1:55 am
Waittilacommercial…
[...] something about waittilacommercial[...]…